TLDR:
- OCC found large banks applied restrictive policies that limited access for several lawful but sensitive industries.
- The agency reported internal rules requiring escalated reviews before certain customers could obtain services.
- Comptroller Gould said the OCC aims to stop actions that could “weaponize finance” across the banking system.
- Thousands of complaints on political and religious debanking remain under review for future public reporting.
OCC Releases Preliminary Findings as the agency intensifies its examination of what it calls “weaponized finance” across the country’s largest national banks.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released an early report detailing how nine major institutions handled debanking practices between 2020 and 2023.
This review is part of the President’s Executive Order on fair banking access and focuses on whether customers were denied services because of lawful business activity, political beliefs or religious affiliation.
The preliminary assessment covers JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank, Capital One, PNC Bank, TD Bank and BMO Bank.
According to the OCC, several institutions implemented policies that created additional hurdles for certain sectors.
Comptroller Jonathan V. Gould set the tone for the review by stating, “The OCC is committed to ending efforts whether instigated by regulators or banks that would weaponize finance.” His remarks underline the agency’s objective to ensure that banking decisions remain neutral.
Banks’ Selective Restrictions Come Under Scrutiny
The OCC stated that a number of banks enforced restrictions or escalated reviews for customers operating in lawful but sensitive industries.
These included oil and gas exploration, coal mining, firearms businesses, private prisons, tobacco and e-cigarette manufacturing, adult entertainment and digital asset operations.
At least one bank applied restrictions on the grounds that certain activities were “contrary to [the bank’s] values,” prompting the agency to question the legitimacy of internal criteria used to assess access.
Comptroller Gould directly addressed the issue, saying, “It is unfortunate that the nation’s largest banks thought these harmful debanking policies were an appropriate use of their government-granted charter and market power.”
His statement suggests that the scale of the institutions made their decisions especially consequential. The OCC added that many of these policies were publicly acknowledged, while others functioned quietly within internal review systems.
The findings indicate that versions of these restrictive measures existed within each of the banks reviewed. The agency noted that the policies resulted in inconsistent treatment of customers, despite all affected industries operating within legal boundaries.
The OCC plans to expand its inquiry to better understand how these measures shaped access to financial services across different sectors, including digital assets.
Ongoing Examination and the Push for Accountability
The OCC emphasized that the review will continue as part of a broader effort to curb selective access to banking.
Comptroller Gould reinforced this direction by stating, “Going forward, the OCC will hold banks accountable for these actions and ensure unlawful debanking does not continue.” His comments point to future supervisory actions intended to prevent similar policies from re-emerging.
The agency is also assessing thousands of complaints related to claims of political and religious debanking. These reports will help determine whether specific customers were denied services because of personal beliefs rather than risk-based assessments.
The OCC said it will release further findings “in due course and as appropriate” once its evaluation of the complaints is complete.
This review, first announced in September 2025, represents the initial public update on the agency’s oversight of major banks’ debanking practices.
The OCC stated that subsequent reporting will provide a broader view of the scale of the actions, the industries involved and the steps required to align banking practices with federal fair access standards.
